论文部分内容阅读
刘洪是中国历法体系奠基人,是杰出的天文学家、数学家,数术功底丰厚.“天目先生”是刘洪的老师之说,自徐岳所著《数术记遗》问世以来近2000年中已广泛流传,从来无人怀疑和提出“天目先生”不是刘洪的老师.笔者在学习和研究过程中认为,“天目先生”不是刘洪的老师,不仅“天目先生”不是刘洪的老师,相反在一定意义上讲刘洪却成了“天目先生”的“父母”和“老师”.笔者就此问题试论浅见.若有不当,恭请指教.“天目先生”根本就不存在史料记载,徐岳和甄(?)都对授业于刘洪怀恩不忘,为什么对刘洪的老师“天目先生”不怀恩不忘呢?尤其刘洪也不对“天目先生”怀恩不忘呢?可见“天目先生”根本就不存在.
Liu Hong is the founder of the Chinese calendar system, is an outstanding astronomer, mathematician, mathematical skills rich. “Mr. Tian Mu” is Liu Hong’s teacher said that since the advent of Xu Yue’s “Number Summary” nearly 2000 It has been widely circulated in the middle of the year that no one has ever doubted or proposed that “Mr. Tian Mu” is not a teacher of Liu Hong. In my study and study, I think Mr. Tian Mu is not a teacher of Liu Hong. Not only is Mr. Tian Mu not Liu Hong Teacher, on the contrary, in a certain sense, Liu Hong has become a “parent” and “teacher” of “Mr. Tianmu.” The author discusses the problem on this view. If improper, please enlighten. “Mr. Tianmu” simply does not exist historical records , Xu Yue and Zhen (?) Are all professors in Liu Huan huannian never forget, why Liu Hong teacher “Mr. Tianmu” not wont forget it? In particular, Liu Hong nor “Mr. Tianmu” wont forget it? Can be seen “ Mr. Tianmu ”simply does not exist.