围绕审知法采的连系性,考夫曼将演绎、归纳、骈推与比类连成体系。其中,演绎为仆,比类是首脑,归纳辅佐,骈推守护清白。演绎在审判训疏与说服总系统中是协和元。考夫曼归纳观的归宿是对旧的律意说服的重新组织。其创新点是说服的三阶式。他的贡献是以逻辑组织连系骈推与演绎。考夫曼认为,法采进程的本质不是逻辑推合,而是比较。律令的颁布与司法中逻辑组织的相似性在于其比类基础。考察了考夫曼比较点的选择后显示,不可抹煞两领域之间的红线。认为考夫曼的重大贡献是将比类引入审判陈说的总组织,它是原省、衡议后的第三元。在论述的基础上,为比类设定了两则对行的准法。 Around the judicial review of mining ties, Kaufman will deductive, induction, 骈 push with the class linked system. Among them, the deduction as a servant, than the class is the head, summarized adjuvant, 骈 push protect innocence. Deduction in the trial training and persuasion of the total system is Concorde yuan. The end of Kaufman’s induction is the reorganization of the old law. Its innovation is to persuade the three-tier. His contribution is connected and deduced by logical organization. Kaufman believes that the essence of the process of Fa Cai mining is not logic, but more. The similarities between the promulgation of the ordinance and the logical organization in the judiciary lie in its base of comparison. After examining Kaufman’s comparison of points, the red line between the two fields can not be obliterated. Kauffman believed that the major contribution of Kaufman was to introduce the category into the general organization of trial Chen, which is the original province and the third after the verdict. On the basis of the discussion, for the class set two quasi-line.