论文部分内容阅读
案例2013年年底,某市重点项目依法征用了M村部分土地,征地补偿款由该村村委会领取。M村第二村民小组的村民认为,被征用的土地包含他们与村委存在争议的土地,争议土地的征地补偿款归村集体是不合理的,应退还给本组成员。在1994年土地调整前,存在争议的约20亩耕地一直由M村第二村民小组村民耕种。1994年,村委会依据当地政府《xx县人民政府关于确认农村土地所有权的通知》,以统分统调方式将第二村民小组耕种的土地收回村集体。由此引发了双方之间就该宗土地所有权的争议问题。
Case Studies At the end of 2013, some key projects in a certain city requisitioned part of the land in village M according to law, and the compensation for land acquisition was collected by the village committee. The villager of the second Villager Group in M Village believes that the requisitioned land contains the land in dispute with the villager committee. The compensation for land acquisition of the disputed land belongs to the village collective and is unreasonable and should be returned to the members of this group. Before the land readjustment in 1994, about 20 mu of arable land in dispute had been cultivated by the villagers of the second villager group M village. In 1994, according to the “Notice of the XXx County People’s Government on Confirming Ownership of Rural Land” issued by the local government, the village committee took the land cultivated by the second villager group in a unified manner and transferred it back to the village collective. This triggered the dispute between the two parties over the ownership of the land.