Spatiotemporal analysis, hotspot mapping, and clustering of confirmed cases of COVID-19 in the initi

来源 :急性病杂志(英文版) | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:griffinroar
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
Objective: To identify the incidence rate, relative risk, hotspot regions and incidence trend of COVID-19 in Qom province, northwest part of Iran in the first stage of the pandemic.Methods: The study included 1125 officially reported PCR-confirmed cases of COVID-19 from 20 February 2020 to 20 April 2020 in 90 regions in Qom city, Iran. The Bayesian hierarchical spatial model was used to model the relative risk of COVID-19 in Qom city, and the segmented regression model was used to estimate the trend of COVID-19 incidence rate. The Poisson distribution was applied for the observed number of COVID-19, and independent Gamma prior was used for inference on log-relative risk parameters of the model. Results: The total incidence rate of COVID-19 was estimated at 89.5 per 100000 persons in Qom city (95% CI: 84.3, 95.1). According to the results of the Bayesian hierarchical spatial model and posterior probabilities, 43.33% of the regions in Qom city have relative risk greater than 1; however, only 11.11% of them were significantly greater than 1. Based on Geographic Information Systems (GIS) spatial analysis, 10 spatial clusters were detected as active and emerging hotspot areas in the south and central parts of the city. The downward trend was estimated 10 days after the reporting of the first case (February 7, 2020); however, the incidence rate was decreased by an average of 4.24% per day (95% CI: ?10.7, ?3.5). Conclusions: Spatial clusters with high incidence rates of COVID-19 in Qom city were in the south and central regions due to the high population density. The GIS could depict the spatial hotspot clusters of COVID-19 for timely surveillance and decision-making as a way to contain the disease.
其他文献
目的探究优质护理干预提升老年慢性便秘患者护理质量及生活质量价值。方法纳入老年慢性便秘(2017年7月—2019年1月)患者60例,将患者分成两组,各30例,对照组患者实施常规临床护理,观察组患者(30例)实施优质临床护理干预,比较两组患者干预后临床疗效、干预前后症状积分变化及护理质量评分、生活质量评分(SF-36)、干预满意率。结果与对照组相比,观察组有效率更高,P<0.05;两组患者干预前症状积分及护理质量评分及生活质量评分比较,P>0.05,干预后症状积分及护理质量评分及生活质量评分均改善
Introduction: COVID-19 patients are susceptible to hypercoagulability, thromboembolic, and vasculitis state; central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) could be ca
目的分析在高血压患者的临床治疗中应用缬沙坦/氨氯地平单片复方制剂的降压效果以及药物安全性。方法抽取2019年10月—2020年12月医院收治的80例高血压患者作为研究样本,分组方式为数字抽签法,分别为试验组(40例,缬沙坦/氨氯地平单片复方制剂治疗)与参照组(40例,缬沙坦联合氨氯地平治疗),比较分析两组患者治疗前后血压指标变化情况(舒张压、收缩压)与药物不良反应发生率(头晕头痛、胃肠不适、肝肾功能受损、皮疹)。结果治疗前,两组患者的血压水平差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后,试验组患者的血压
目的分析急性胰腺炎患者护理中分级式急诊护理的应用效果。方法2019年3月—2020年3月,选取医院88例急性胰腺炎患者,按电脑随机分组法分为X组与Y组,X组为分级式急诊护理,Y组为常规急诊护理,对比X组与Y组分诊、候诊、治疗时间以及护理满意度、病情判断与抢救情况。结果X组与Y组相比,患者分诊、候诊、治疗时间较短,同时,护理满意度评分更高,P<0.05,差异有统计学意义;X组患者病情判断正确率、抢救成功率分别为95.5%、90.9%,Y组患者分别为65.9%、59.1%,比较两组患者病情判断正确率与抢
Objective: To assess the knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) regarding COVID-19 among COVID-19 patients and their relation with the outcomes.Methods: This c
目的 探讨在脑卒中护理过程中人性化护理的临床应用效果.方法 随机选取天津市第四中心医院神经内科收治的86例脑卒中患者作为试验研究的对象(病例时间选取范围介于2018年12月
目的对比分析不同药物在治疗幽门螺杆菌相关性胃溃疡过程中的临床效果。方法本次试验的对象为98例幽门螺杆菌相关性胃溃疡患者,其纳入时间由2018年12月起并截止于2019年12月,根据随机双盲法平均将患者分为试验组(患者例数为49例,治疗药物为埃索美拉唑)与对比组(患者例数为49例,治疗药物为奥美拉唑)。结果治疗后,试验组患者腹痛、腹胀、嗳气、胃灼热等胃肠道症状与对比组患者相比均明显较轻,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);试验组患者治疗效果显著高于对比组患者,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论
肝癌发病率高,转移性强,预后较差。肝癌的主流治疗方法包括广泛使用的手术切除、放化疗及新兴的靶向治疗、免疫治疗和纳米材料治疗。多种治疗手段的应用对于肝癌的化疗耐药具有一定的治疗作用。同时,多种天然化合物在抑制癌症发生机制方面发挥作用,它们能够抑制肝癌的进展。综述总结了多种治疗方法的优势与最新进展,并展望了未来肝癌治疗的趋势与手段。
目的探究环孢菌素A治疗再生障碍性贫血的临床效果以及不良反应情况分析。方法选取再生障碍性贫血患者72例,佳木斯市中心医院2018年12月—2019年12月收治,按照随机数字表法划分成观察组(环孢素A与雄激素治疗)及对照组(雄激素方法治疗方式)均为36例。比较分析临床上患者的不良反应、血象变化、临床疗效等。结果观察组疾病总有效率34例(94.44%)较对照组27例(75.00%)更高(P<0.05);相较于对照组13例(36.11%),观察组的临床不良反应总发生率为3例(8.33%)较低(P<0.
目的研究给予脑梗死合并假性球麻痹致吞咽困难患者康复护理的效果。方法于蚌埠医学院第一附属医院患者中随机抽取60例,分为两组,对照组给予常规护理,观察组给予康复护理,对比两组患者康复情况。结果经研究,对照组有效率21例(70.0%)。观察组有效率29例(96.7%)。对照组住院费用(2.68±0.39)万元,住院时间(22.36±4.90)d,满意度21例(70.00%)。观察组住院费用(1.83±0.47)万元,住院时间(19.21±2.46)d,满意度29例(96.67%)。与对照组对比,差异有统计学意义