论文部分内容阅读
清水凯夫~1清水凯夫先生:九月二十八日大函敬悉,照片亦收到,谢谢!在长春得以聆听高论,深受启迪,十分荣幸。关于《文选》编者,我仍相信当以萧统为主,他身边的文士自然要大帮其忙,而主编恐非他莫属。萧纲、萧绎令手下人编书,往往著其主名,史书亦有明确记载,此是内行风范,萧统想亦如此;而《文选》并未著刘孝绰之名,可见刘氏远非主编。
Kei Shimizu ~ 1 Keisuke Shimizu: We are grateful to have a letter on September 28, and the photos have been received. Thank you! It is a great honor to hear a lot about Enlightenment in Changchun. As for the editors of “anthologies,” I still believe that when the chief of Xiao Tong is dominant, the scribes around him naturally have to do a great deal of their own favor, and the editor should not be afraid of him. Xiao Gang, Xiao Yi order to subordinate books, often with its name, history books are also clearly documented, this is an expert demeanor, Xiao Tongxiang so; and “Wenxuan” is not the name of Liu Xiaochao, we can see Liu is far from editor.