论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨不同阶段、不同主体系统化护理干预对提高母乳喂养率的意义和优势。方法对2013年1月-2013年12月在全市5家医院妇产科从怀孕初期就排除了母乳喂养禁忌征的产妇共600例作为调查研究对象,按照产妇是否愿意接受系统化护理干预,将所有产妇平均分成对照组和干预组,每组包含产妇数量各为300例。在不同阶段对不同组别产妇进行系统护理干预和普通护理方式,研究系统护理干预对母乳喂养率的影响。结果进行系统化护理干预后成功选择母乳喂养产妇比例比传统护理方法有明显提高,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);孕育中期、分娩前一周护理以及产后一周、产后三周的接受母乳喂养率明显地高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);医院方面、产妇本人、婴儿状况、产妇家属以及外部环境的护理干预均是母乳喂养是否成功的因素,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对产妇在不同阶段实行系统化护理措施干预,可以有效地提高母乳喂养的成功率,对进一步完善护理措施提供了一定的指导和思路。
Objective To explore the significance and advantages of systematic nursing intervention by different subjects in improving breastfeeding rates at different stages. Methods From January 2013 to December 2013, 600 obstetrics and gynecologists in five hospitals in the city excluded breastfeeding taboo syndrome as the research object. According to the mothers’ willingness to receive systematic nursing intervention, All maternal average divided into control group and intervention group, each group contains the number of maternal each 300 cases. At different stages of different groups of mothers of systematic nursing interventions and general care to study the impact of systematic nursing intervention on breastfeeding rates. Results The percentage of successful breastfeeding mothers after systematic nursing intervention was significantly higher than that of traditional nursing methods (P <0.05). In the second trimester of pregnancy, one week before giving birth and one week after giving birth, three weeks after giving birth were breastfeeding (P <0.05). In the hospital, nursing interventions such as maternal status, infant status, maternal status and external environment were all successful factors in breastfeeding, with statistical significance (P <0.05). Conclusions Intervention on the maternal systematic nursing intervention in different stages can effectively improve the success rate of breastfeeding and provide some guidance and ideas for further improvement of nursing measures.