论文部分内容阅读
在《二十四史》中,《明史》部头仅次于《宋史》,质量也可与“前四史”比肩,向来好评如潮,并为明史研究者所重视。但因纂修时间较长,而且书成众手,其中存在的问题也不算少。今人通过考证,纠正《明史》中的疏漏讹误,不仅可以使《明史》更加完善,而且也有助于研究者更为准确地运用史料,确实是一件相当有意义的学术活动。最近由社会科学文献出版社出版的庞乃明先生的《〈明史·地理志〉疑误考正》一书,应该是自《明史》成书以来,对其“地理志”部分进行的最系统、最全面的一次文字考订。该书也是国家“点校本《二十四史》修订工程’’之《明史》修订的阶段性成果之一。通读全书,其主要特点体现在以下几个方面。首先,该书发现、改正了《明史》”地理志“中的大量失误。据粗略统计,全书考正疑误一
In the ”Twenty-Four Histories,“ the ”Ming History“ department is only inferior to the ”History of the Songs“ and its quality can be compared with ”The First Four Historians“, and has always been highly acclaimed and has been valued by researchers in the history of Ming Dynasty. However, due to the compilation of a longer time, and books into public, there are not too many problems. It is indeed quite a significant academic activity that the present person can correct and correct the omission and corruption in the Ming Dynasty not only to make ”Ming History“ more perfect, but also to help researchers use historical materials more accurately. Recently published by the Social Sciences Academic Press, Mr. Pang Nai Ming’s ”The Ming and Qing Dynasties“ test of doubt ”should be from the“ Ming Shi ”since the book, the“ geography ”part of the most systematic, The most comprehensive text test. This book is also one of the phased achievements of the revision of the “Ming History” of “Revision Project” in the “School-based” Twenty-four History of the Country.From the whole book, its main features are reflected in the following aspects.First, the book found that the correction A large number of mistakes in the “Ming History” “Geography” According to rough statistics, the book test is correct