论文部分内容阅读
谭清洋在《一篇学风不端的博士论文》中指出刘方博士论文《宋代两京都市文化与文学生产》中有诸多抄袭和不合学术规范之处,刘方的回应文章《尊重学术事实是维护学风的基础》全盘否认,认为谭文为“误读”和“误解”。本文回应刘文,指出刘文的辩难策略在于避重就轻,具有鲜明的误导性和武断性,其学理之辩则概念混乱、漏洞百出。本文最后一一胪列刘方博士论文的抄袭事实。
Tan Qingyang pointed out in his dissertation on doctoral dissertations that there are many plagiarism and irregularities in Liu Fang’s dissertation, “Two Kyoto Metropolitan Culture and Literary Production in Song Dynasty.” Liu Fang’s response to the article “respect academic fact is to maintain the style of study Based on ”a total denial that Tan Wen as “ misunderstanding ”and “ misunderstanding ”. This article responds to Liu Wen, pointing out that Liu’s defense strategy is to evade the severity of the problem and has a clear misleading and arbitrary attitude. The concept of his theory is confused and full of loopholes. This last article lists the plagiarism facts of Dr. Liu’s thesis.