论文部分内容阅读
本文在对《1844年经济学哲学手稿》及摘录笔记的出版和研究情况进行简要介绍后,着重以阿姆斯特丹国际社会史研究所保存的原始文献为依据,对《手稿》及摘录笔记的文献学信息作了详细的描述,从而在此基础上对《手稿》及摘录笔记的诞生次序做了极为严格的、文献学的考证研究,还原了其诞生过程。由此得出的结论是:“第二手稿”很可能是《穆勒摘要》的结尾;《手稿》可能并不是马克思在其“序言”中提到的那部著作;不能把《手稿》同摘录笔记割裂开来。
After a brief introduction to the publication and research of the 1844 Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts and excerpts notes, this essay focuses on the documentary information of “Manuscripts” and excerpt notes based on the original documents preserved by the Institute of International Social History in Amsterdam Made a detailed description, on this basis, made a very strict examination of the sequence of the birth of “manuscripts” and excerpts of notes, researches and studies of documentary studies, restoring their birth process. The conclusion that follows is that “the second manuscript” is likely to be the end of the “Mill Summary”; “the manuscript” may not be the one Marx refers to in the “Preface”; can not Separate the “manuscript” from the extract note.