论文部分内容阅读
正史之校勘,代有其人,有清以降,更是成果累累。關於《宋書》,除清人札記而外,近人專著即有張元濟《宋書校勘記》、王仲犖《宋書校勘記長編》、丁福林《宋書校議》以及單篇論文十數篇。新近又見陳爽先生《〈太平御覽〉引〈宋書〉考》一文(以下簡稱“陳文”)~②,在將《御覽》所引900餘條《宋書》文字與今本《宋書》逐一比勘的基礎上,或掘剔訛誤,或出檢異文,或蒐考遺佚,對於今本《宋書》的刊謬補缺,可謂大有裨益。然智者千慮,難免一失,細審之下,其中亦
The history of the school collation, on behalf of others, there is clear down, it is fruitful. On the “Song book”, in addition to the Qing dynasty notes, the recent monographs are Zhang Yuanji “Songs collation”, Wang Zhongli “Song school collaterals editor”, Ding Fulin “Song school” and a single article of dozens of articles. Recently, I also read the article entitled “The Peace Taoyuan Expedition” cited in the book “Song Dynasty” (hereinafter referred to as “Chen Wen”) ~ The present “Song book” one by one than on the basis of reconnaissance, or dig tick corruption, or check the prose, or search for the remains, for today’s “Song book,” the publication of abortion, can be described as helpful. However, the wise man is anxious, it is inevitable that foolproof, under the fine review, of which also