论文部分内容阅读
法学是一门极富魅力的学科,这种魅力在于法律概念与法律规则的表述是严谨的逻辑与生动的语词的完美结合体。然而,这种结合体的特性也势必会提高人们对于法律理解的难度,关于证据的定义就是这样一个典型的例证,古今中外的学者们围绕这个问题殚精竭虑,提出种种不同的观点,但迄今为止仍众说纷纭,莫衷一是。2012年3月14日,睽达16年的《刑事诉讼法》,这部与公民权利息息相关、与打击犯罪密切相连的国家之大法终于迎来了自1979年创设起的第二次大修改,这在中国的司法界具有里程碑的意义。这次的刑事诉讼法修改非常全面,其有关证据的法规自然也发生了“翻天覆地”的变化,其中第48条对刑事证据的定义问题,作出了新的阐述,借此契机,笔者运用逻辑理论工具,分析与论证刑事证据新定义逻辑上的正确性,并对新定义背景下的证据属性问题进行辨析,以期对证据法学的繁荣与发展有所助益。
Law is a fascinating discipline, the charm of which lies in the legal concept and the expression of legal rules is the perfect combination of rigorous logic and vivid words. However, the characteristics of such combination will inevitably raise people’s difficulty in legal understanding. The definition of evidence is such a typical example. Scholars both at home and abroad have tried their best to solve this problem and put forward different opinions. However, so far, Different opinions, incomprehensible. On March 14, 2012, the 16-year-old Criminal Procedure Law, which is closely linked with the rights of citizens, has finally brought about the second major revision since its creation in 1979, This is a milestone in the judiciary in China. This revision of the criminal procedure law is very comprehensive, and its laws and regulations on evidence naturally have undergone “earthshaking changes.” Article 48 of the definition of criminal evidence made a new exposition, to take this opportunity, the author used Logic theory tool, analyze and prove the correctness of the new definition of criminal evidence, and analyze the attribute of evidence under the background of new definition in the hope of contributing to the prosperity and development of evidence law.