近读《南方周末》童大焕先生文章《公权与私权》,觉得大理通,小理不通。远华“红楼”对外开放,展出三部小车,两部是给地方官行的贿,一部是赖昌星馈赠给“某歌星”的。于是潘多拉写文章说,于是网民在“坛子”里说:地方官都在新闻里被指名道姓,可是这“某歌星”是谁?对此,大焕说:地方官以公权为赖氏开绿灯,事发后理当被指名道姓,而“某歌星”以私权为交换,其真名实姓应该得到保护,并认为这未必不是“社会成熟的表现”。 Recently read “Southern Weekend” Mr. Tong Dahuan article “public rights and private rights”, that Dali, small unreasonable. Yuanhua “Red House” opened to the outside world and exhibited three small cars. Both were bribes to local government officials. One was Lai Changxing’s gift of “a singer.” So Pandora wrote an article, so netizens in the “jar” said: local officials are named in the news, but who is “a singer”? In this regard, Dahuan said: Local officials to the public as Lai When the “green star” is exchanged for private rights, its real name should be protected and this may not necessarily be “a manifestation of social maturity.”