论文部分内容阅读
就文学思想的阐释路径而言,值得关注的有二:一为历史思想史路径;一为哲学观念史路径。前者侧重文学思想的相关性研究,重点关注文学思想史上文论家与文论流派以及思想体系赖以生成的具体的复杂的历史情境,通过重现过往的思想发展历程来呈现出思想的复杂性和丰富性,偏重于文学研究的“外在路径”;后者注重文学思想的逻辑性研究,重点关注文学思想体系自身的整体性与连续性以及问题意识的自主性,常常借助于概念、范畴、命题之间的逻辑论证来呈现不同思想体系之间的内在理论脉络,偏重于文学研究的“内在路径”。两者虽然在理论预设、研究对象、研
In terms of the path of interpretation of literary thought, there are two issues of concern: one is the path of history and the other is the path of history of philosophy. The former focuses on the study of the relativity of literary thoughts, focusing on the specific complex historical situations that literary theorists and literary schools and the system of ideology rely on, showing the complexity of thought by reproducing the development process of the past thoughts Emphasizing the logical study of literary thinking, focusing on the integrity and continuity of literary and ideological systems as well as the autonomy of problem consciousness, often through the use of concepts , Categories, propositions between the logic of arguments to show the different theoretical systems within the theoretical context, emphasis on literary studies “inner path ”. Although both in the theoretical presupposition, research object, research