人民法院代表国家行使神圣的审判权。审判只有在公平公正的情况才能完美地体现出其权威性。控辩平等对抗,法官居中裁判是一种理想的、完美的诉讼格局。但是在我国的刑事诉讼实践过程中,公安机关,检察机关和司法机关之间的职能关系在一定程度上是本末倒置的。虽然说从“做饭、端饭、吃饭”的层面来看法院处于顶层地位,然而从最近社会曝出的一系列冤假错案来看,在诉讼活动地位上侦查权的强势、公诉权的优势以及审判权的弱势体现的淋漓尽致,以审判为中心就是在这种诉讼活动实践中的缺陷下应运而生。那么在这种体制影响下,刑事证据制度必将发生一系列的改革和完善。 People’s courts exercise sacred jurisdiction on behalf of the state. Trial can demonstrate its authority perfectly only if it is fair and just. Accused and accused of equal confrontation, the judge at the center of the referee is an ideal, perfect litigation pattern. However, during the practice of criminal procedure in our country, the functional relationship between public security organs, procuratorial organs and judicial organs is to some extent upside down. Although the courts are at the top level from the perspectives of “cooking, dine and eating,” the Court of Justice is at the top level. However, judging from the series of unjust and wrong-mistaken cases recently exposed by the society, the power of investigative powers in litigation activities and the right of public prosecution As well as the weakness of judicial power. The trial-centeredness came into being in the shortcomings of the practice of this litigation. Then under the influence of such a system, a series of reforms and perfection of criminal evidence system will surely take place.