新课程改革的科学性、实用性、先进性和前瞻性给课堂带来了的新活力和希望,但世界上没有完全相同的两片树叶,由于教师的学历层次、教学风格和兴趣爱好等方面是参差不齐的,许多表面生动活泼的的课堂,教学效果也不尽人意,使轰轰烈烈的新课改走进了以下四条“死胡同”.其一,把“满堂提问”变为“满堂灌输”.提问是一门艺术,假如教师的课堂提问缺乏针对性,往往导致课堂教学,以满堂提问代替满堂灌输,这样违背了启发式的教学原则,课堂上学生还是被教师牵着鼻子,盲目应 The new curriculum reform has brought new vitality and hope to the classroom in terms of its science, practicability, advancedness and forward-lookingness. However, there are not exactly two leaves in the world. Due to the different levels of academic qualifications, teaching styles and interests of teachers Is uneven, many lively and vivid classrooms, teaching results are unsatisfactory, the vigorous new curriculum into the following four “dead ends.” First, the If the teachers’ questions in the classroom are lack of pertinence, they often lead to classroom teaching, which will replace the whole classroom with instilling into the classroom. This violates the heuristic teaching principle that the students in the classroom are still being led by teachers Nose, blind should