论文部分内容阅读
1999年9月28日,原告乔某与建筑公司签订聘用合同。合同时间从1999年9月15日开始,聘用乔某为市场管理员,月工资为500元。合同规定管理员在管理期间的责任即:市场必须井井有条,不得有混乱现象等。由于乔某在管理期间未尽全责,建筑公司以其市场管理差为由,于1999年11月以口头形式通知,解聘乔某,并付清了乔某在聘期问两个月的全月工资1000元。2001年1月7日,乔某向地区劳动争议仲裁委员会申请仲裁,该仲裁委员会于2001年1月12日以申请时效已过,作出不予受理的通知。乔某不服向法院提起诉讼,请求被告支付原告支付从1999年9月15日至起诉时16个月工资,扣除已支付的2个月外尚有14个月工资7500元和违约金720元。一审法院经审理判决:驳回原告诉讼请求。原告不服一审判决提起上诉,二审法院维持了一审判决。
On September 28, 1999, the plaintiff, Qiao Mou, signed a contract of employment with the construction company. Contract time from September 15, 1999 began to hire Joe as a market administrator, the monthly salary of 500 yuan. The contract stipulates that the manager’s responsibility during the management period is: the market must be well-organized and there must be no chaos. As Qiaomou not fully responsible during the management, construction companies to its poor management of the market, in November 1999 verbally notified, dismissed Qiaomou, and paid Qiao Mou in the employment period asked for two months The monthly salary of 1,000 yuan. On January 7, 2001, Qiaomou applied for arbitration to the Labor Dispute Arbitration Commission of the People’s Republic of China, and on January 12, 2001, the Arbitration Commission terminated the application with a limitation of time and made a notice of inadmissibility. Qiaomou dissatisfied with the lawsuit to the court, requesting the defendant to pay the plaintiff from September 15, 1999 to 16 months at the time of the prosecution, after deducting paid 2 months there are still 14 months salary of 7500 yuan and liquidated damages of 720 yuan. The court of first instance tried the case: dismissed the plaintiff’s claim. The plaintiff refused to accept the judgment of first instance and appealed. The court of second instance upheld the verdict of first instance.