今年高考语文卷上有六道改正语病的小题,要求只改一处,不得改变原意。其中一题是:过去,我们曾不加分析地批判了他在文艺创作上的某些观点。现在看起来,当时的批判是失之偏颇和不够慎重的。据局部统计,多数考生都能看出“失之偏颇和慎重的”有语病,但多数考生不能获得此题的全分。究竟“失之偏颇和慎重的”错在哪里,怎样改正最为恰当?这就有必要对“失之偏颇”进行一番考察。我们先看这个“失”字。“失”的本义是 This year’s college entrance examination on the Chinese language roll has six shortcomings for correcting language problems, requiring only one change, not to change the original meaning. One of the questions is: In the past, we criticized his views on literary creation without analysis. It now appears that the criticism at that time was biased and not prudent. According to local statistics, most candidates can see that there are words that are “biased and cautious,” but most candidates cannot obtain the full score of this question. What exactly is wrong and what is the most appropriate thing to correct? It is necessary to make some investigations on “biasedness.” Let’s look at this word “miss” first. The original meaning of “missing” is