论文部分内容阅读
法益在前实定法和实定法范畴内具有不同的意涵,前实定法范畴的先法性法益属于事实性法益概念,实定法范畴的宪法性法益和后刑法法益属于规范性法益概念。事实性法益相对于规范性法益是无限的,规范性法益内部的宪法性法益相对于后刑法法益具有无限性。罪刑法定是后刑法法益有限性的界分点,字面含义是后刑法法益指导对行为构成解释的最大边界。宪法性法益定义犯罪的立法概念,后刑法法益只能定义犯罪的司法概念;计算机诈骗行为在中国刑法中不能用具有有限性但边界模糊的后刑法法益作指导进行盗窃罪的扩张解释,应该以具有无限性的宪法性法益为指导新立罪刑规范。
Legal interests have different meanings in the former statutory and statutory categories. The first legal statutory benefit in the real statutory category belongs to the concept of factual statutory benefit, the legal statutory benefit in the real statutory category and the legal interest in the latter belong to the concept of legal statutory benefit. The fact that the legal interest is relative to the normative legal interest is unlimited, and the normal legal interest within the normative legal benefit is infinite compared with that after the criminal law. The law of legality is the bounded point of the limited legal benefit of criminal law, the literal meaning is the biggest boundary explaining the behavioral constitution of the latter. Constitutional law and benefit define the concept of criminal legislation, the criminal law can only define the concept of criminal justice; computer fraud in China’s criminal law can not be limited but ambiguous boundary of the criminal law after the benefit of criminal law to explain the expansion of theft should be based on The Infinite Constitutional Benefit is Guiding New Norms of Crime.