论文部分内容阅读
太平天国政权的性质问题,从1978年以来,史学界展开了热烈的讨论,先后发表约40余篇文章。各持己见,众说不一,但归纳来看,有三种提法。即封建政权说;两重性政权说,农民政权说。所以存在意见分歧,我们认为:一是在阐述问题时,有所脱离农民阶级的具体事实;二是在于分析该问题时所持的标准不同;三是立论点和分析问题的方法不一致。现对太平天国政权的性质,提出以下粗浅的意见。不当之处,请同行指教。
The nature of the Taiping Rebellion has been heatedly debated since 1978 by historians and published about 40 articles. Each has their own opinions, different opinions, but summarized, there are three kinds of references. The feudal regime, said the duality regime said that the peasant regime said. Therefore, there are disagreements. We think: First, there are some specific facts that are deviated from the peasant class in elaborating the issue; second, they are different in the standards they hold when analyzing the issue; third, they are inconsistent with the methods used to analyze the issue. Now on the nature of the Taiping Rebellion, put forward the following superficial opinions. Inappropriate place, please advise peers.