论文部分内容阅读
目的:评价艾灸联合弥可保治疗糖尿病周围神经病变的疗效。方法:对糖尿病周围神经病变患者80例按1:1比例等分为联合组和对照组,两组基于等同的基础治疗之上,联合组用艾灸联合弥可保治疗,对照组单纯用弥可保治疗,疗程3个月,比较治疗前后的神经传导速度变化和症状改善情况。结果:联合组和对照组神经传导速度均改善,以联合组改善更明显;联合组和对照组显效、有效、无效分别是52.5%、32.5%、15.0%和35.0%、27.5%、37.5%,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.01或 P<0.05)。结论:建立于基础治疗之上的艾灸联合弥可保治疗糖尿病周围神经病变优于单纯弥可保治疗。
Objective: To evaluate the curative effect of moxibustion combined with miconazole on diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Methods: Eighty patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy were equally divided into the combined group and the control group according to the ratio of 1: 1. The two groups were based on the same basic treatment. The combined group was treated with moxibustion combined with Mi-Bao, while the control group Can protect the treatment, treatment for 3 months, comparing the changes in nerve conduction velocity before and after treatment and symptom improvement. Results: The nerve conduction velocity in the combined group and the control group was improved and the improvement was more obvious in the combination group. The effective rate and the effective rate in the combined group and the control group were 52.5%, 32.5%, 15.0% and 35.0%, 27.5% and 37.5% There was significant difference between groups (P <0.01 or P <0.05). CONCLUSION: Moxibustion combined with Miconazole, which is based on basic treatment, is superior to meclofibrate in treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy.