论文部分内容阅读
目的:引进Mc Hale编制的协同教养问卷,在中国父母群体中进行修订和信效度检验。方法:通过方便取样对北京325名父亲施测,进行项目分析和探索性因素分析。通过方便取样,对全国483名父亲和477名母亲实施问卷调查,进行验证性因素分析,计算内部一致性系数。通过方便取样对北京和山西的211名父亲施测,计算效标效度和重测信度。结果:探索性因素分析发现问卷包括团结、一致、冲突和贬低四个维度;验证性因素分析表明四因素模型拟合良好。团结、一致维度与婚姻满意度呈显著正相关,与儿童内向性行为问题呈显著负相关;冲突、贬低维度与婚姻满意度呈显著负相关,与儿童内向性行为问题呈显著正相关。各维度内部一致性系数为0.61到0.88,重测信度为0.47到0.69。结论:协同教养问卷中文版具有良好的信效度,可作为中国父母协同教养研究的工具。
OBJECTIVE: To introduce a collaborative erection questionnaire prepared by McHale to conduct revision and reliability-validity tests among Chinese parents. Methods: 325 parents in Beijing were tested by convenient sampling for project analysis and exploratory factor analysis. Through convenient sampling, 483 fathers and 477 mothers nationwide were surveyed, and the confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to calculate the internal consistency coefficient. Through convenient sampling, 211 fathers in Beijing and Shanxi were tested to calculate the validity and test-retest reliability. Results: Exploratory factor analysis found that the questionnaire included four dimensions of unity, agreement, conflict and demeaning; confirmatory factor analysis showed that the four-factor model fit well. Unity and Uniform dimension were positively correlated with marital satisfaction and negatively correlated with children’s introverted sexual problems. There was a significant negative correlation between conflict and demeaning dimensions and marital satisfaction, and positively correlated with children’s introverted sexual behaviors. The internal consistency coefficient of each dimension was 0.61 to 0.88, and the test-retest reliability was 0.47 to 0.69. Conclusion: The Chinese version of the Collaborative Education Questionnaire has good reliability and validity and can be used as a tool for Chinese parental co-rearing research.