乾嘉考据时代与博学时代有许多值得比较之处。它们致力于传统的史料的收集、整理、考证、编著等工作。二者在形成的背景上都处于理性主义史学的前夜,为近代新史学奠定了基础。以复古为解放,溯源辨伪。并走向由宽入窄的深入的专门研究。在治学上都有着辉煌的成就,体现出从怀疑到批判的求真精神,一定程度上也致力于史学创新。 There are many worth comparing between the era and the erudite era. They are devoted to the collection, collation, textual research and compilation of traditional historical materials. On the eve of the rationalist historiography, both of them lay the foundation for modern new historiography. In order to emancipate the retro, trace the authenticity. And headed by wide-ranging in-depth specialized research. In the study have brilliant achievements, reflecting the spirit of truth from doubt to criticism, to a certain extent, also committed to historiography innovation.