教师批改作业,习惯于对全对的作业,用“一百分”或“A++”予以鼓励,对中等生一般不评,则写上“更正”两个字,我个人认为,这样的批语对优生来说,固然高兴,但对于潜能生来说,就未必。《数学课程标准》要求:“对学生数学学习的评价,既要关注学生知识与技能的理解和掌握,更要关注他们情感与态度的形成和发展。”我们可以改变单一的评价方式,一边笔批,一边有针对性地对每一个学生进行语评。笔者在作业批改中针对不同层次的学生,不同类型的作业,有针对性地为每个学生写上批语。我常用的批语有以下几种形式。 Teachers have changed their assignments and are accustomed to encouraging them with “one percent” or “A ++” for the whole pair of work. If they do not give a general rating for secondary students, they write “correct”. I personally think that such criticisms Eugenics, of course, happy, but for potential students, not necessarily. The standard of mathematics curriculum requires: “The evaluation of students ’mathematics learning should not only pay attention to the understanding and mastery of students’ knowledge and skills, but also pay attention to the formation and development of their emotions and attitudes.” We can change the single evaluation method Batch, while the targeted each student language assessment. The author in the homework revision for different levels of students, different types of homework, write a comment for each student. There are several forms of my commonly used comments.