论文部分内容阅读
保证期间和诉讼时效的关系问题是一个长期争论的民法热点话题。《担保法》第25条2款的规定与《担保法司法解释》第31条、34条、36条的规定相互冲突,其结果会导致司法实践中适用法律的混乱。厘清保证期间和诉讼时效的关系,并在立法上加以完善,是解决问题的根本出路。本文通过比较和分析,指出了上述条款的缺陷,并提出修改建议。
The issue of the relationship between the guarantee period and the limitation of action is a hot topic of civil law that has long been debated. The provisions of paragraph 2 of Article 25 of the Guarantee Law conflict with the provisions of Articles 31, 34 and 36 of the “Judicial Interpretation of the Guarantee Law”, which results in the confusion of applicable laws in judicial practice. To clarify the relationship between the guarantee period and the limitation of action and to improve it in legislation is the fundamental solution to the problem. Through the comparison and analysis, this paper points out the shortcomings of the above provisions, and put forward suggestions for amendment.