《经济学动态》1996年第5期刊登丁湘文章,认为社会主义条件下的劳动力是不是商品的问题,虽然经过长期讨论,但观点仍然对立,之所以不能取得共识,其症结主要是由于劳动力商品理论的误区所致。 误区之一,劳动力商品与社会主义等同论。丁文认为劳动力商品是商品经济发展的客观必然性,它与市场经济一样不是社会主义独有的,而是资本主义与资本主义共有的,属于中性。劳动力是否商品不是划分社 According to Ding Xiang’s article published in the Fifth Issue of Economics in 1996, the labor force under socialism is considered to be not a commodity. Although it has been debated for a long period of time, its view is still in opposition and its consensus can not be reached. The crux of the problem is mainly due to labor force Mistakes caused by the theory of goods. One of the myths is the same argument between labor and goods and socialism. Ding Wen believes that the commodity of labor is the objective necessity of the development of commodity economy. Like the market economy, Ding Wen does not belong to socialism. Instead, capitalism shares capitalism and is neutral. Whether the workforce is not a division of labor