论文部分内容阅读
对张九龄及王湾诗中所涉之“綦毋学士”进行考证,从史载綦毋潜为集贤待制材料的矛盾中看到了材料来源可能有误,又从綦毋潜现存作品没有与张九龄及王湾相交的记录、与王湾交者官终“补阙”而綦毋潜官终“著作郎”(或广文博士),说明二者非一人。这位“綦毋学士”既与张九龄及王湾相交,说明其人应是张说拔在集贤者;又从集贤十八学士中有毋煚,据有关史料,其人就是綦毋煚,所以肯定这个毋煚即是与张王交者“綦毋学士”,从而彻底否定了开元“綦毋学士”是綦毋潜的传统说法。
The textual research on Zhang Jiu-ling and Wang Wan’s poem “Bachelor Bachelor” shows that the source of the material may be wrong from the contradiction between the historical facts and the latent materials, The records of Zhang Jiuling and Wang Wan intersecting with Wang Wanjiao’s concluding “Bu Que” and “Wei Lang” (or Guang Wen) indicate that they are both non-official. This “Bachelor Bachelor” not only intersects with Zhang Jiu-ling and Wang Wan, but also shows that people should be Zhang Zhisu in the collection of Jixian; and from Jixian 18 Bachelor, there is no doubt that according to the historical data, Therefore, I affirmed that this is a non-existent and Zhang Wangjiao “not bachelor”, which completely denied the Kaiyuan “not Bachelor” is a nonsense traditional argument.