一、专利司法解释(二)明确专利权间接侵权法律构成的意义专利侵权判断一般情况下采取全面覆盖原则,例外情况下采取等同原则,仅仅制造或销售用于专利产品生产的材料、设备、零部件、中间物等(以下简称专用品)的行为,或者引诱他人实施侵犯专利权的行为,并不直接侵害专利权。司法实务中,法官虽无法援引专利法条文认定此等行为构成直接或者间接侵害专利权,但仍然可以援引侵权责任法第九条的规定认定此等行为构成帮助或者教唆侵害专 I. The Judicial Interpretation of Patent (II) The Significance of the Law of Indirect Infringement of Patent Right The patent infringement judgment adopts the principle of comprehensive coverage under normal circumstances. In exceptional circumstances, it adopts the principle of equality and only makes or sells the materials, equipment and zero used in the production of patented products Parts, intermediates, etc. (hereinafter referred to as special products), or to induce others to infringe upon the patent right, and not directly infringe upon the patent right. Judicial practice, although the judge can not invoke the provisions of the Patent Law found that such acts constitute a direct or indirect infringement of patent rights, but can still be invoked Article T of the Tort Law found that such acts constitute aids or abetting violations