论文部分内容阅读
目前,许多历史学家在世界史、全球史和新全球史的标题下研究全球化进程。三者之间有多种分歧,但均试图超越欧洲中心论和民族国家的传统史学框架。在研究方法上,三者均追求多学科和跨学科的把握。从本质上说,三者的视角均基于后殖民及后帝国主义的话语之上并有所突破,核心在于将全球化视为某种历史过程。世界史的特点是潜在地囊括一切;全球史以世界史上无所不在且日渐增强的相互联系、相互依赖的全球过程为线索展开;而新全球史聚焦于全球化的当代进程,强调研究和教学并重。
At present, many historians study the process of globalization under the headings of world history, global history and new global history. There are many differences between the three, but all attempt to go beyond the traditional historiography framework of European centralism and nation-state. In the research methods, all three pursue the mastery of multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary. In essence, the three perspectives are based on and make breakthroughs in the postcolonial and post-imperialist discourse, with the core being the consideration of globalization as some kind of historical process. The history of the world has the potential to encompass everything; the history of the world begins with a clues to the ubiquitous and ever-increasing global process of interdependence and interdependence in world history; and the new global history focuses on the contemporary process of globalization, emphasizing both research and teaching.