卫生防疫站有偿服务创收与分配,两者相比,前者有国家政策和收费标准作保证,后者则缺乏政策依据,更无分配标准可寻。财务工作和领导者在实际操作上,前者较易,后者则较难。 卫生防疫站创收分配之难,就难在防疫站有偿服务的过程是“开放”和“封闭”相结合的,即提供给需求者的服务方式是现场(开放)和实验室(封闭)结合进行的。以监测为主体的收费项目,大多数需要卫生防疫人员登门,在现场采集样品,带回站里交有关检验科室进行检验。由于检验科室分工较细,有的检验项目需 Sanitation and anti-epidemic stations have paid service for income generation and distribution. Compared with the former, the former has national policies and charging standards as guarantees, while the latter lacks policy basis, and no allocation criteria can be found. The actual work of financial work and leaders is easier for the former and difficult for the latter. The difficulty in generating revenues and distributions for health and epidemic prevention stations is that the process of paid services at the epidemic prevention stations is a combination of “open” and “closed,” ie, the service provided to demanders is a combination of on-site (open) and laboratory (closed) services. of. Most of the toll collection projects that are monitored mainly require sanitation and anti-epidemic personnel to go to the gate, collect samples at the site, and bring it back to the station for inspection. Due to the fine division of labor in the laboratory, some test items need to be