论文部分内容阅读
(一)版权间接侵权责任立法界现状1、版权间接侵权责任英、美法系考察在保护版权的同时,美国也注意到各方利益的平衡,法律明文规定了间接责任豁免。美国1976年《版权法》虽然没有列举“间接侵权”行为,但却针对判例中认定“帮助侵权”的规则规定了几种“法定豁免”。在网络方面,美国1998年制订的《数字千年版权法案》(DMCA法案)并没有无限扩大网络服务商的版权侵权责任,该法案第二标题是关于网络服务商的免责内容,俗称为“避风港”条款。
(1) Indirect Infringement in Copyright Legislation Status of Legislative Circles 1. Indirect Infringement of Copyright Responsibilities While studying copyright protection in the United States and the United States, the United States also notices the balance of interests of all parties. The law explicitly stipulates the indirect liability exemption. Although the 1976 U.S. Copyright Act did not enumerate “indirect infringement”, several “statutory exemptions” were stipulated in the jurisprudence of the “rules of tort”. On the network side, the United States’ Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA Act) enacted in 1998 does not limit indefinitely the infringement of copyright infringement by Internet service providers. The second title of the act is the exemption content of network service providers, commonly known as the “safe haven ”Clause.