论文部分内容阅读
在控制行政责任的观念史中,一直存在着外部控制和内部控制两种争论。在实践当中,两者分别对应于制度机制与道德机制的运用。将其分别概括成“制度论”和“道德论”两种主张,以揭示两种不同路径的控权技术及其内在逻辑。两者在人性假设、核心技术、交易确定性、实施风险和实施效果上都存在着巨大的差异,但也都提供了控制行政责任的理论启示。现实的道路则是协调和综合两种手段,以实现全面的行政责任。
In the history of the idea of controlling administrative responsibility, there have been two kinds of arguments: external control and internal control. In practice, the two correspond to the application of institutional and moral mechanisms respectively. They are summarized as “system theory” and “moral theory” two kinds of claims, in order to reveal the two different path control technology and its inherent logic. Both have great differences in human nature hypothesis, core technology, trade certainty, implementation risk and implementation effect, but also provide the theoretical enlightenment of controlling administrative responsibility. The road to reality is both coordinated and integrated approaches in order to achieve full administrative responsibility.