论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨综合护理干预对前列腺增生患者生活质量的影响。方法选取本院2013年5月—2015年5月的128例前列腺增生患者进行护理干预分析,分为护理组和对照组各64例,对照组采用常规护理,护理组在对照组的基础上进行综合护理干预,采用抑郁自评量表(self-rating depression scale,SDS)和焦虑自评量表(self-rating anxiety scale,SAS)评价两组患者的抑郁和焦虑程度,并用国际前列腺症状评分量表(international prostate symptom rating scale,IPSS)评价患者的前列腺的排尿症状,采用生活质量(quality of life,QOL)评分对护理前后两组患者的生活质量进行评价。计量资料采用t检验,P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果护理组患者护理后的QOL的评分明显优于对照组,SDS评分和SAS评分明显低于对照组,IPSS评分明显低于对照组,对比差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论对前列腺增生患者进行综合护理干预可以更好地改善患者的抑郁和焦虑,提高患者的生活质量,具有重要的临床意义。
Objective To explore the effect of comprehensive nursing intervention on quality of life in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Methods A total of 128 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia from May 2013 to May 2015 in our hospital were selected and divided into two groups: nursing group and control group, with 64 cases in each group. The control group received routine nursing. The nursing group was based on the control group Combined with nursing intervention, the depression and anxiety of the two groups were evaluated by self-rating depression scale (SDS) and self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), and the scores of the International Prostate Symptom Scale The international prostate symptom rating scale (IPSS) was used to evaluate the urinary symptoms of the prostate in patients. Quality of life (QOL) was used to evaluate the quality of life of the two groups before and after nursing. Measurement data using t test, P <0.05 for the difference was statistically significant. Results The score of QOL after nursing in nursing group was significantly better than that of control group. SDS score and SAS score were significantly lower than those in control group, and IPSS score was significantly lower than that of control group (all P <0.05). Conclusions Comprehensive nursing intervention in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia can improve depression and anxiety and improve the quality of life of patients, which is of important clinical significance.