论文部分内容阅读
引言专利法的侵权损害赔偿制度一直以来都依赖于专利权人和侵权人之间的假设性协商的构建。假设性协商的构建要求事实发现者运用经济学上的合理原则来确定专利许可费的合理价格。通常事实发现者会运用乔治亚-太平洋(Georgia-Pacific)要素来完成定价。一直以来,合理许可费(reasonable royalty)的分析框架和Georgia-Pacific分析法因其对各种事实情形的强大适应性而闻名。合理许可费的确定符合法理且顺乎情理,它使得专利权人可以从侵权人创设的专利使用功能中获得赔偿。然而,近年来不少学者主张严格约束合理许可费的计算方法,为专利许
INTRODUCTION The patent infringement damages system has always been dependent on the construction of hypothetical negotiations between the patentee and the infringer. The construction of hypothetical negotiations requires fact discoverer to apply reasonable economic principles to determine the reasonable price of royalty. The usual fact discoverer uses the Georgia-Pacific element to complete the pricing. The analytic framework of reasonable royalty and Georgia-Pacific analytics have long been known for their strong adaptability to a variety of factual situations. The determination of a reasonable royalty is in line with jurisprudence and is based on the principle that it enables the patentee to obtain compensation from the patent-use function created by the infringer. However, in recent years, many scholars advocate strict constraint reasonable licensing fee calculation method for the patent