论文部分内容阅读
Choice of first line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC)is based on tumour and patient related factors and molecular information for determination of individual treatment aim and thus treatment intensity.Recent advances(e.g.,extended RAS testing)enable tailored patient assignment to the most beneficial treatment approach.Besides fluoropyrimidines,irinotecan and oxaliplatin,a broad variety of molecular targeting agents are currently available,e.g.,anti-angiogenic agents(bevacizumab)and epidermal growth factor receptor(EGFR)antibodies(cetuximab,panitumumab)for first line treatment of mCRC.Although some combinations should be avoided(e.g.,oral or bolus fluoropyrimidines,oxaliplatin and EGFR antibodies),treatment options range from single agent to highly effective four-drug regimen.Preliminary data comparing EGFR antibodies and bevacizumab,both with chemotherapy,seem to favour EGFR antibodies in RAS wildtype disease.However,choosing the most appropriate treatment approach for mCRC patients remains a complex issue,with numerous open questions.
Choice of first line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is based on tumor and patient related factors and molecular information for determination of individual treatment aim and thus treatment intensity. Recent advances (eg, extended RAS testing) enable tailored patient assignment to the most beneficial treatment approach. Besides fluoropyrimidines, irinotecan and oxaliplatin, a broad variety of molecular targeting agents are currently available, eg, anti-angiogenic agents (bevacizumab) and epidermal growth factor receptor (cetuximab, panitumumab) for first line treatment of mCRC. Although some combinations should be avoided (eg, oral or bolus fluoropyrimidines, oxaliplatin and EGFR antibodies), treatment options range from single agent to highly effective four-drug regimen. Preliminary data comparing EGFR antibodies and bevacizumab, both with chemotherapy, seem to favorite EGFR antibodies in RAS wildtype disease.However, choosing the most appropriate treatment approach for mCRC patients remains a complex issue, with numerous open questions.