论文部分内容阅读
主管一下属在评估上的不一致在某种程度上就是主管在对一些事情(比如绩效)上的评估和下属所做出的评估之间存在差异。随着越来越多的研究者对组织成员行为(OCB)产生兴趣,随之而来的各种混杂的和矛盾的结论使得主管和下属在对OCB 评估上的不一致成为人们关注的中心。然而,以往的大多数研究者仅仅考察了评估级别上的不一致,而忽略了其他方面的不一致。本文区分了7种主管一下属在评估上的不一致性,而且可以利用确证性因素分析方法(CFA)来加以探查,讨论了每一种不一致形式产生的原因,概念定义和现实含义,并通过300个主管和下属对 OCB 评估的模拟数据展示了这一分析过程。
The discrepancy between supervisors and subordinates is, to some extent, a discrepancy between supervisors 'assessments of things (such as performance) and subordinates' assessments. As more and more researchers are interested in OCB, the mixed and contradictory conclusions that follow lead to the discrepancy between supervisors and their subordinates in assessing OCB as the center of attention. However, most of the previous researchers only examined inconsistencies in the assessment level, ignoring other aspects of inconsistency. This article distinguishes between the seven executive-subordinate evaluations of inconsistency and can be explored using a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) approach, discussing the causes, conceptual definitions, and real meanings of each of the inconsistent forms, This analysis is demonstrated by the in-charge and subordinate simulations of OCB assessments.