论文部分内容阅读
如何累计多次盗窃的犯罪数额,最高人民法院曾于1997年11月4日发布的《关于审理盗窃案件具体应用法律若干问题的解释》(以下简称《解释》)第5条第12项中作出规定:“多次盗窃构成犯罪,依法应当追诉的,或者最后一次盗窃构成犯罪,前次盗窃行为在1年以内的,应当累计其盗窃数额。”从多年来的司法实践情况看,这一规定在不同地区实际执行的情况不尽相同。有的不论盗窃行为是否构成犯罪,一律累计追诉;也有的完全按照上述规定的字面含义,仅仅累计所列举的两种盗窃行为类型。这些长期存在的不同理解是否合理、缘由何在、有无统一执法的路径?值得深入讨论。
How to accumulate the number of thefts for multiple crimes, the Supreme People’s Court made it in Article 5, Item 12, “Interpretation of Several Issues Concerning the Specific Application of Laws in the Trial of theft Cases” (hereinafter referred to as “Interpretation”) promulgated on November 4, 1997 Provisions: “Multiple theft constitutes a crime, should be prosecuted according to law, or the last theft constitutes a crime, the previous theft in less than 1 year, the amount of theft should be accumulated.” Judicial practice over the years from the point of view, this There are different situations in which a regulation is actually implemented in different regions. Some prosecuted regardless of whether or not theft constituted a crime, while others also accumulated only the two types of theft listed in the light of the above definition. Whether these longstanding differences of understanding are reasonable, where their causes lie, and whether they have a uniform law enforcement path deserve further discussion.