论文部分内容阅读
广东发展创汇农业的现状广东是我国重要的出口商品基地,其中农产品出口一直占相当的份额。1955～1985年,全省农产品出口总额从1.29亿美元增加到10.68亿美元,30年增长7.3倍,年平均增长7.2%。凭籍毗邻港澳、华侨众多的条件,通过三十多年的耕耘,广东已初步形成“以港澳市场为主,以鲜活商品为主”的农产品出口格局,初步建成以珠江三角洲为中心,以汕头、湛江沿海地区为两翼,以广大丘陵山区为腹地的农产品出口商品基地。但是,在相当一段时期中,广东创汇农业呈现相对疲软的现象。农产品出口增长相对于农产品总产值增长的速度下降,农产品出口值占农产品总产值的相对额也下降。“六五”期间农业总产值年平均增长7.5%,而农产品出口值年平均增长仅5.5%;1985年广东农业生产总额174.85亿元,农产品外贸收购17.99亿,占10%左右,扣除加工品部分,只占7.4%。造成上述落后状况的原因是复杂的,
Status Quo of Guangdong’s Development of Foreign Exchange-earning Agriculture Guangdong is an important export commodity base in China, of which agricultural exports have always accounted for a considerable share. From 1955 to 1985, the total export of agricultural products in the province increased from 129 million U.S. dollars to 1.068 billion U.S. dollars, increasing 7.3 times in 30 years with an average annual increase of 7.2%. By virtue of the conditions of neighboring Hong Kong, Macao and overseas Chinese and numerous overseas Chinese, through the thirty years of hard work, Guangdong has initially formed the export pattern of agricultural products “mainly in Hong Kong and Maucao markets and mainly in the form of fresh products”. The Pearl River Delta has been initially built to serve as Shantou, Zhanjiang coastal areas for the two wings to the vast hilly mountain hinterland agricultural products export commodities base. However, for a considerable period of time, Guangdong’s foreign exchange earning agriculture has shown a relatively weak phenomenon. The rate at which the growth of export of agricultural products relative to the growth of the total output value of agricultural products dropped, and the relative value of the export value of agricultural products to the total output value of agricultural products also declined. During the “Sixth Five-Year Plan” period, the total output value of agriculture increased at an average annual rate of 7.5% while that of agricultural products increased only 5.5% annually. In 1985, the total agricultural output in Guangdong reached 17.485 billion yuan, while that of agricultural products was 1.799 billion, accounting for about 10% , Only 7.4%. The reasons for the above-mentioned backward conditions are complicated,