过去车是面子,是一部分先富人群展示身份或地位的象征。当然,现在车作为普及性的交通运输工具,无论是哪个阶层的人都可以拥有。而这也是十余年来呼吁“车回归它本来交通属性”的重大成果。但如果我们真把车全看作是一辆可以移动的工具,似乎又少了很多趣味,少了一丝人性在其中。确实,说车就是车,本没有错,因为言论者可能更多站在社会学的角度来谈论问题,出发点涉及贫富差距,抑或是路权平等。 In the past, cars were a symbol of the status or status of some of the first rich people. Of course, cars are now universal means of transportation and can be owned by any class of people. And this is also a major achievement of calling for more than a decade to “return the car to its original traffic attributes.” But if we really think of the car as a mobile tool, it seems a little less interesting, with less of a humanity in it. Indeed, it is not wrong to say that a car is a car, because the speaker may talk more about the issue from the perspective of sociology. The starting point relates to the gap between the rich and the poor, or the equality of the right of way.