论文部分内容阅读
中国现代文学研究中存在着一种惯性,即二元对立思维模式下简单化的截然两分,这种惯性造成了中国现代文学史研究的某些缺失与结论偏颇。以1930年代左翼与“自由人”、“第三种人”的文艺论争为例,苏汶正是文学政治化时代一个被阉割、被遮蔽的历史人物。由此可见,若想中国现代文学研究取得新拓展、步入新境界,就必须具有理性的问题反思和自我批判,即研究中的超越与去蔽。
There is a kind of inertia in the study of Chinese modern literature, that is, the simplification and bisectionality in the binary opposition mode of thinking. This inertia has caused some deficiencies and conclusions in Chinese modern literature history research. Taking the literary and art debates between the left wing of the 1930s and the “free man” and “the third human being” as examples, Su Wen is a historical figure castrated and concealed in the age of literary politicization. This shows that if we want to make new progress in the study of modern Chinese literature and step into a new realm, we must have rational questions of reflection and self-criticism, that is, transcendence and deception in our study.