司法实践中父母擅自将未成年子女[1]共有房屋进行抵押行为的效力认定不一,就目前而言,我们到底应本着公平正义之原则认定无效还是应当本着维护交易安全稳定的精神确认有效?笔者以为在目前司法实践宜本着维护契约稳定、促进经济发展的精神,认定父母将未成年子女共有房屋进行抵押行为有效。 Judicial practice parents unauthorized use of mortgages by minor children [1] shared the validity of different premises, for the moment, we should be based on the principle of fairness and justice, or should be based on the maintenance of security and stability in the spirit of the transaction to confirm Effective? I believe that in the current judicial practice should be based on the maintenance of contract stability and promote economic development, that parents share the houses of minors for mortgage effective.