论文部分内容阅读
根据信息是否来自于(1)制定法或普通法指定的有权机关、(2)当事人、(3)审判程序、(4)法官或者、(5)事实认定者,刑事审判中信息的辅助性来源可以被进一步地予以细分。本节只介绍这些子分类中的前三种,将“司法认知”的话题放在下一节中单独研究。本章的最后将就始于第三章的话题——陪审员的常识性知识与背景假设的意义,继续进行深入地探讨。贯穿整个分析过程的一条主线是,每一种辅助性信息来源在理论和实践
Depending on whether the information comes from (1) a statutory or common law authority, (2) a party, (3) a judicial proceeding, (4) a judge or (5) a de facto adjudicator, an adjunct to information in criminal trials Sources can be further subdivided. This section only covers the first three of these sub-categories, placing the topic of “judicial awareness” in a separate study in the next section. The chapter ends with an in-depth discussion that begins with the topic in Chapter 3, the common-sense knowledge of jurors and the background assumptions. One of the main lines running through the analysis is that each of the supporting sources of information in theory and practice