论文部分内容阅读
从代议民主的角度看,司法审查和民主之间确实存在着矛盾,美国司法审查的几种理论路径不能解释清楚司法审查正当性的问题,伊利的程序主义理论回避司法审查合法性的实体问题即国会立法违背宪法的客观标准为何,宪法文本的不确定性使得司法审查的客观标准成为一个难题,但是如果从动态的民主参与方面看,对国会立法进行违宪审查的目的是建立一种动态的参与民主机制,在代议民主和大众之间建立沟通的桥梁,使民众的话语得到张扬,让民主运转起来,故美国确立司法审查的理论基础是动态的参与民主机制。
From the perspective of representative democracy, there are indeed contradictions between judicial review and democracy. Several theoretical approaches to judicial review in the United States can not explain the legitimacy of judicial review. Erie’s procedural theory evades the substantive issue of judicial review of legitimacy That is why the objective legislation of the Congressional legislation violates the Constitution, the uncertainty of the constitutional textures makes the objective standard of judicial examination a challenge, but if from the aspect of dynamic democratic participation, the purpose of the unconstitutional review of the legislation of the Congress is to establish a dynamic To participate in the democratic mechanism and establish a bridge of communication between the representative democracy and the general public so that the discourse of the people can be made public and the democracy can operate, the theoretical basis for establishing judicial review in the United States is a dynamic mechanism for participating in democracy.