论文部分内容阅读
自2001年被誉为是“开创了我国宪法司法化先例”的“齐玉岑受教育权案”后,公民直接运用宪法保护自身权益的案件时有发生。不久前,报端又见“四川大学学生诉蛾眉山管委会”案(见《中国青年报》2002年9月4日,2002年10月14日)。案中原告以管委会侵犯其宪法权利——平等权——为由起诉。这类案件在彰显公民权利意识觉醒的同时,也引发了人们对于在现行宪政体制下诉诸宪法,启动宪法救济问题的思考。我们认为:在现行宪政体制下。寻求宪法救济不具有可行性。
Since 2001, it has been hailed as the case of the “Right to Education of Qi Yu-cen”, which “set a precedent for the judicialization of the constitution of our country.” Citizens directly use the Constitution to protect their own rights and interests from time to time. Not long ago, the newspapers also saw the case of “Sichuan University Students v. Mt. Meadow Hill” (see “China Youth Daily” on September 4, 2002 and October 14, 2002). In the case, the plaintiff sued on the grounds that the CMC infringed upon his constitutional rights - equal rights. While such cases highlight the awakening of civil rights awareness, they also raise the people’s thinking on the issue of resorting to the constitution and starting the constitutional relief under the current constitutional system. We think: Under the current constitutional system. Seeking constitutional relief is not feasible.