过去我读周予同先生《经学历史》序言时,就注意到他为日本学者本田成之撰写了《支那经学史论》,而对无中国学者做类似的工作感到惭愧。最近读到上海书店重新出版本田成之的《中国经学史》(即《支那经学史论》)很是感慨。在两千多年的中国学术史上,读书人没有不通经的,其中固然有将其作敲门砖的原因,但是经学所讲的义理,在中国两千多年的社会生活中,实实在在是我们民族文化的核心部分,经学的历史实际就是我们民族主流文化的历 In the past, when I read Mr. Zhou Yutong’s preface to the History of Confucian Classics, I noticed that he wrote the book Zhoushan Hsu for the Japanese scholar Honda Chengzhi, but felt ashamed of doing similar work for no Chinese scholars. Recently I read the Shanghai Bookstore and republished Honda’s “History of Chinese Classics” (that is, “the history of Zhinajing”) is very mixed feelings. For more than two thousand years of Chinese academic history, there are no unreasonable sources for scholarly scholars. Although there are certainly some reasons why they should be regarded as pretexts, the righteousness taught by Confucianism in our study of more than two thousand years of Chinese social life is really our nation The core of culture, the history of the school is actually the history of our nation’s mainstream culture