每一个时代的人们其实都在重新定义他们所在时代的经典。前一个时代的经典往往沦为后一个时代的非经典。好像曾经的明星,后来湮没无闻。而后一个时代的经典,往往是前此遥远时代的非经典。好像重要的考古发现,颠覆了人们的常识。在中国书法史上,经典与非经典是不断地在转换的。如果只是抱住经典不放,恰如刻舟求剑。相反,如果走到经典的反面,唯非经典是从,也必将作茧自缚。《金刚经》云:“所谓佛法者,即非佛法,是名佛法。”如以论书,所谓经典者,即非经典,是名经典。所谓经典者,假名经典也。即非经典者,空无经典也。是名经典 The people of every age are in fact redefining the classics of their time. The classic of the previous era tends to be reduced to the non-classic of the latter era. Seems to have celebrities, and later obliterated. Then the classic of an era is often the non-classic before this distant era. It seems like an important archaeological discovery that subverts people’s common sense. In the history of Chinese calligraphy, the classic and the non-canon are constantly changing. If you just hold on to the classic, just as carving sword. On the contrary, if you come to the opposite side of the classic, only the classic is, it will also be cocooned. “Diamond Sutra” cloud: “The so-called Buddhist, that is, non-Buddhism, is the name of Dharma.” "Such as theorists, the so-called classic, that is, non-classic, is a classic. The so-called classic, classic kana. That is non-classical, empty classic also. Is a classic