论文部分内容阅读
東晉初年豫章太守梅賾所獻孔傳本古文《尚書》(以下簡稱“梅本古文《尚書》”),其真僞問題,自古至今,争論頗多。自清華簡刊布以來,以其中的《尹誥》、《傅説之命》與梅本古文《尚書》的《咸有一德》和《説命》相對照,後者非先秦古籍已爲學人所共知,但前者多出伏生所傳今文《尚書》的其他篇章尚未有新發現的先秦古籍以確定其真僞。筆者近來對這一問題作了些考察,覺得根據相關文獻記載,再結合清華簡的有關情況,仍可對這一問題進行推斷,故撰成此小文,供學人參考。
In the early years of the Eastern Jin dynasty, the prince Yu memorializes the truth of the Confucian classics, “Shang Shu” (hereinafter referred to as the “Primula”), which has been controversial since ancient times. Since the publication of Tsinghua Jane’s Muppets, the “Yin and Han” and “Fu’s life” have been compared with “Xianlianyi” and “Huan Ming” in the ancient text of Shang Dynasty by Mei Ben, Known, but the former is more voluminous Biography of this article, “Shang Shu” other chapters have not yet found new ancient books to determine its authenticity. I recently made some observations on this issue, I feel that according to the relevant literature, combined with the relevant circumstances of Tsinghua University, can still be inferred on this issue, so I wrote this small article for reference for scholars.