论文部分内容阅读
文章通过参加了2006年港口国监督(PSC)研讨会议,通过会议上对几个典型船舶争议缺陷案例研讨,使我对今后港口国监督有了更深刻的认识和一些新的思考,本人在本文中通过对M／VMOL MAAS轮的一个具有典型争议缺陷案例的分析(该缺陷曾在亚太地区PSC委员会上作为一个典型案例进行过激烈的争论),并结合2005年《船舶滞留专家复审制度》的实施,来分析目前我们在港口国监督过程中存在的问题,研究和探讨今后在港口国监督特别是在船舶滞留专家复审中的新措施。
Through the participation in PSC seminar in 2006 and the case study of several typical ship controversies at the conference, the article made me have a deeper understanding and some new thoughts on the future port state superintendence. Through an analysis of a typical dispute resolution case for the M / VMOL MAAS round, which had been the subject of a heated debate on the PSC committee in the Asia-Pacific region, and in conjunction with the 2005 Retention System for Ships Retained Implementation, to analyze the problems we currently have in the process of port State control, and to study and explore new measures for the future review of port State control, especially for ship retention experts.