论文部分内容阅读
我们在对刑法学理论进行研究的时候,通常把危险接受分为两种情况。第一种就是实害结果的发生由被害人自己支配,在被告人的危险行为中有被害人参与的成分;另外一种就只实害结果的发生由被告人的行为所支配,属于之一种合意的行为。所以,在研究刑法学理论的时候,我们要能够准确分清楚哪些属于危险接受理论,哪些不属于危险接受理论。如果在被害事件中,被害人直接参与到其中,并且最后发生的结果是由被害人导致的则最后造成的结果不属于是犯罪。本文主要就刑法学理论中危险接受法理进行分析,旨在能够更加了解危险接受理论。
When we study the theory of criminal law, we generally divide the danger acceptance into two kinds. The first is that the actual result of victimization is dominated by the victim and the victim is involved in the dangerous act of the defendant. The other is that the result of the actual result is dominated by the defendant’s behavior, the behavior of. Therefore, in the study of criminal law theory, we must be able to accurately distinguish what is dangerous to accept the theory, which is not dangerous to accept the theory. If the victim is directly involved in the victimization and the eventual result is the result of the victim, the final result is not a crime. This article mainly analyzes the theory of dangerous acceptance of jurisprudence in criminal law theory, aiming at a better understanding of the theory of dangerous acceptance.