论文部分内容阅读
小双桥遗址发现以来,学界对其性质探讨热烈,先后有都说、宫庙祭祀遗址说、离宫别馆说、盘庚迁殷殷都说、祖乙居庇庇都说等一系列观点问世。虽然至今仍无定论,但越来越多的学者认可小双桥商都为都的观点。学者们虽然对小双桥遗址的具体属性有不同见解,但都认为小双桥遗址是都城或者都城的组成部分。良性的讨论有利于研究的深入和学术的进步。
Since the discovery of Xiao Shuangqiao ruins, the academic circles have been enthusiastic about their nature. There have been many said that the temple sacrificial sites say that the palace of the imperial palace said that Pan Geng moved in earnest to say that Zuyi Habitat shelter said a series of opinions came out. Although still inconclusive, more and more scholars have accepted the view that Xiaoshuangqiao is a capital city. Although scholars have different opinions on the specific properties of Xiaoboshan ruins, they all think that Xiaoshuangqiao ruins are part of the capital city or capital city. Positive discussion is conducive to further research and academic progress.