我国民事诉讼法将当事人陈述规定为法定证据之一种,但司法实践中当事人陈述的证据性功能已名存实亡。借鉴他国经验,在我国确立当事人询问制度,并规定相应的程序及惩罚措施等,是解决此种矛盾的有效途径。 The Civil Procedure Law of our country stipulates the parties’ statements as one of the statutory evidences, but the evidence-based functions stated by the parties in judicial practice have existed in name only. Learning from the experience of other countries, establishing the parties’ inquisition system in our country, and stipulating corresponding procedures and punitive measures are effective ways to solve such contradictions.